Testimony

testimony before state legislature
use TAGs to differentiate years

2020 Testimony – 55

Oppose- AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Support- AAC the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship Support- AAC Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; I’m opposed to AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. This bill as yet another political attack on gun owners and the Second Amendment by […]

2020 Testimony – 55 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 56

Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, Courts have identified seven key elements in procedural due process; 1. Notice 2. A neutral decision-maker 3. An opportunity to make an oral presentation 4. The opportunity to present evidence 5. The opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and respond to evidence 6. Right to representation by counsel 7. A decision

2020 Testimony – 56 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 57

Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, Courts have identified seven key elements in procedural due process; 1. Notice 2. A neutral decision-maker 3. An opportunity to make an oral presentation 4. The opportunity to present evidence 5. The opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and respond to evidence 6. Right to representation by counsel 7. A decision

2020 Testimony – 57 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 58

Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, Courts have identified seven key elements in procedural due process; 1. Notice 2. A neutral decision-maker 3. An opportunity to make an oral presentation 4. The opportunity to present evidence 5. The opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and respond to evidence 6. Right to representation by counsel 7. A decision

2020 Testimony – 58 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 59

Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to HB5448, An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. There is no need to change Connecticut’s current law. This current law is available to anyone at any time 365 days a year with police arriving within minutes from the time of call. In Connecticut, a confiscation petition may be

2020 Testimony – 59 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 60

To Whom it May Concern, OPPOSE Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant SUPPORT Raised HB-5390 An Act Concerning the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship. SUPPORT- Raised HB- 5432 An Act Concerning Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons. I’m opposed to HB-5448 because it doesn’t afford due process protections,

2020 Testimony – 60 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 61

Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; This is another opportunity for the state to potentially deprive certain people of their civil liberties. Oppose Raised HB-5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. Support bills like Raised HB-5390 and Raised HB-5432. Sincerely,  [INSERT NAME] [INSERT TOWN] 

2020 Testimony – 61 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 62

Oppose Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee Keep the due process, allow for an investigation before rights are taken away. Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case necessarily will produce a high error rate. Support Bill #5432

2020 Testimony – 62 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 63

Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; Support- H.B. 5390 AAC the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship Support- H.B. 5432 AAC Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons OPPOSE- H.B. 5448 AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant H.B. 5448 AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant this bill would demand that anyone who has had a

2020 Testimony – 63 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 64

Connecticut General Assembly Joint Committee on Judiciary Legislative Office Building, Room 2500 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 Re: OPPOSTITION to H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT.  Support to H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Support to H.B. 5432 AN ACT

2020 Testimony – 64 Read More »

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security